ok, thanks. What i have empirically learned is to set the number of locks to be greater
than the max number of members in a group. 30,000 wasn’t enough because i had some groups
with 36K members. It would appear an internal lock is being used for each DN when
processing a group object. I bumped the number up to 100,000 based on future projections
for number of members in a group. If my empirical learning is right, this might be
something useful (and fairly important) to document. In fact, I would recommend the dev
team to dramatically increase the default of 10,000.
/mrg
On Apr 14, 2014, at 15:12, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Michael R. Gettes wrote:
> ok, this appears to be user error. Sorry.
>
> i am still curious if this only need be done on replicated masters and not the
read-only replicas or must this be configured on all servers.
Glad to hear it was ok. I suggest to set 30000 on all servers since the deletion is
replicated to each read only replica and the DB behaves in the same way.
Thanks,
--noriko
>
> thanks!
>
> /mrg
>
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 14:22, Michael R. Gettes <gettes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am using 389-Directory/1.2.11.29 B2014.094.2116
>>
>> when deleting a large group (let’s say members > 25000) we see the following
error in the errors log
>> (which yields an Operations Error (err=1) back to the ldap client) and creates an
object with
>> dn:
nsuniqueid=cef92c21-b69711e3-8a25d834-1f7e47a1,CN=CommunityBLAH,ou=BLAH,DC=BLAH
>>
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - libdb: Lock table is out of available lock
entries
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - idl_new.c BAD 22, err=12 Cannot allocate memory
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - database index operation failed BAD 1130, err=12
Cannot allocate memory
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - database index operation failed BAD 1140, err=12
Cannot allocate memory
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - database index operation failed BAD 1230, err=12
Cannot allocate memory
>> [14/Apr/2014:13:21:49 -0400] - database index operation failed BAD 1030, err=12
Cannot allocate memory
>>
>> after investigating the error message I tried to increase the number of locks
according to the documentation in section 2.5 of the admin guide “Lock Files” by setting
nsslapd-db-locks to 30000. I notice in cn=database,cn=monitor,cn=ldbm
database,cn=plugins,cn=config the attribute nsslapd-db-configured-locks does not change -
it was 10000 before I set it to 30000 and it remains 10000.
>>
>> Is this expected behavior? I can’t see any other indication my change has taken
effect (I do see my change in cn=config,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config).
>>
>> Also, if I set this attribute (nsslapd-db-locks) on my multi-replicated masters
to resolve this problem, do i need to set it on my non-master servers?
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>> /mrg
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users