Mark,
Here's:
(gdb) where
#0 0x00007ffff455399f in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff453dcf5 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff5430cd0 in PR_Assert () at /lib64/libnspr4.so
#3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at
ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471
#4 0x00007ffff7b72257 in valueset_array_purge (a=0x7fff8c022aa0,
vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:804
#5 0x00007ffff7b723c5 in valueset_purge (a=0x7fff8c022aa0,
vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:834
#6 0x00007ffff7ada6fa in entry_delete_present_values_wsi_multi_valued
(e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0,
csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0)
at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:777
#7 0x00007ffff7ada20d in entry_delete_present_values_wsi
(e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0,
csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0)
at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:623
#8 0x00007ffff7adaa7a in entry_replace_present_values_wsi
(e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x7fff8c0127c0,
csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:869
#9 0x00007ffff7adabf1 in entry_apply_mod_wsi (e=0x7fff8c01f500,
mod=0x7fff8c0127a0, csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at
ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:903
#10 0x00007ffff7adae52 in entry_apply_mods_wsi (e=0x7fff8c01f500,
smods=0x7fff977fd3c0, csn=0x7fff8c012160, urp=8) at
ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:973
#11 0x00007fffead19364 in modify_apply_check_expand
(pb=0x7fff8c000b20, operation=0x814160, mods=0x7fff8c012750,
e=0x7fff8c01bc90, ec=0x7fff8c01f480, postentry=0x7fff977fd4b0,
ldap_result_code=0x7fff977fd434, ldap_result_message=0x7fff977fd4d8)
at ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:247
#12 0x00007fffead1a430 in ldbm_back_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at
ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:665
#13 0x00007ffff7b0cd60 in op_shared_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20, pw_change=0,
old_pw=0x0) at ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:1021
#14 0x00007ffff7b0b266 in do_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at
ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:380
#15 0x000000000041592c in connection_dispatch_operation (conn=0x150e220,
op=0x814160, pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:638
#16 0x0000000000417a0e in connection_threadmain () at
ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:1767
#17 0x00007ffff544a568 in _pt_root () at /lib64/libnspr4.so
#18 0x00007ffff4de52de in start_thread () at /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#19 0x00007ffff46184b3 in clone () at /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) print *vs->sorted[0]
Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffff
Thanks,
Alberto Viana
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Mark Reynolds <mreynolds(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 4/22/20 3:15 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
William,
Here's:
(gdb) frame 3
#3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at
ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471
471 PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num <
VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >=
VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num)));
(gdb) print *vs
$1 = {num = 21, max = 32, sorted = 0x7fff8c023ad0, va = 0x7fff8c022b50}
Can you also do a "print *vs->sorted[0]" ?
And a "where" so we can see the full stack trace that leads up to this
assertion?
Thanks,
Mark
Thanks,
Alberto Viana
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:52 PM William Brown <wbrown(a)suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Apr 2020, at 02:55, Alberto Viana <albertocrj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I build my own packages (from source), here's the info:
> > 389-ds-base-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > 389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm
> > python3-lib389-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.noarch.rpm
> >
> > I'm running in centos8.
> >
> > Here's what I could debug:
> >
https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62
> >
https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/94fc3521024c7a508f1726923936e476
>
> So that assert seems to be:
>
> PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num <
> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >=
> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num)));
>
> But it's not clear which condition here is being violated.
>
> It looks like your catching this in GDB though, so can you go to:
>
>
https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62
>
> (gdb) frame 3
> (gdb) print *vs
>
> That would help to work out what condition is incorrectly being asserted
> here.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> >
> >
> > Do you guys need something else?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Alberto Viana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:03 PM William Brown <wbrown(a)suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 1 Apr 2020, at 05:18, Mark Reynolds <mreynolds(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/31/20 1:36 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
> > >> Hey Guys,
> > >>
> > >> 389-Directory/1.4.2.8
> > >>
> > >> 389 (master) <=> 389 (master)
> > >>
> > >> In a master to master replication, start to see this error :
> > >> [31/Mar/2020:17:30:52.610637150 +0000] - WARN -
> NSMMReplicationPlugin - replica_check_for_data_reload - Disorderly shutdown
> for replica dc=rnp,dc=local. Check if DB RUV needs to be updated
> >
> > Also might be good to remind us what distro and packages you have
> 389-ds from?
> >
> > > Looks like the server is crashing which is why you see these
> disorderly shutdown messages. Please get a core file and take some stack
> traces from it:
> > >
> > >
>
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#sts=Debugging%C2%A0Crashes
> > >
> > > Can you please provide the complete logs? Also, you might want to
> try re-initializing the replication agreement instead of disabling and
> re-enabling replication (its less painful and it "might" solve the issue).
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Even after restart the service the problem persists, I have to
> disable and re-enable replication (and replication agr) on both sides, it
> works for some time, and the problem comes back.
> > >>
> > >> Any tips?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Alberto Viana
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> 389-users mailing list --
> > >> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >>
> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to
> > >> 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >>
> > >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > >>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > >>
> > >> List Guidelines:
> > >>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >>
> > >> List Archives:
> > >>
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
> > > --
> > >
> > > 389 Directory Server Development Team
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
> >
> > —
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > William Brown
> >
> > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> > SUSE Labs
> >
>
> —
> Sincerely,
>
> William Brown
>
> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> SUSE Labs
>
>
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
--
389 Directory Server Development Team