Hi,
There may be several attributes of interest to you as far as the memory
consumption is concerned (
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Comma...)
:
nsslapd-dbcachesize
nsslapd-cachememsize for every backend (by default, your data is in
cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config)
nsslapd-import-cachesize (used only during ldif import)
You can adjust the corresponding values by monitoring the attributes like
currententrycachesize or entrycachehitratio of
cn=monitor,cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config (
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Comma...
)
2009/6/26 Tim Hartmann <hartmann(a)fas.harvard.edu>
Hi!
I was spending some time today trying to make sure that I was getting the
most bang for my buck today an my replica's and I notices two items of
interest that I was wondering if anyone else had input on!
Firstly, after creating a number of indexs, my performance seems to be
really good, the exception that I noticed was "finger" I noticed that finger
takes a couple of seconds to return the data on RHDS whereas on OpenLDAP, it
pops right now in real time! My first though was that I was doing an
un-indexed search, but I can't for the life of me figure out what I might
not be indexing that I should be!
The second thing I noticed was that on my servers, which are RHEL5, running
32bit OS's with the PAE Kernels, RHDS doesn't ever actually address more
then 3 gig of ram! I was looking through the documentations, and it looks
like by raising the "Maximum Cache Size" I'll be able to allow RHDS to use
more of the available memory.. did I get that right?
Anyway, as always thanks in advance for all the help! This list has been a
tremendous resource for an application that keeps on showing it's value in
huge ways!
Best,
Tim
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users