On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:19 -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
On 07/21/2011 02:40 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 16:06 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> On 07/19/2011 02:11 PM, Hugh Brock wrote:
>>> Infrastructure-around-Conductor features:
>>
>> Can we do something around, import from Kaetello, i.e. some or other
>> end-to end case from a content source service.
>>
>> To be specific, get the import of a Katello template into image-factory
>> definition and build as part of a deployable.
>
> I see Aeolus as exposing an Image Factory API which Katello uses.
>
> On the Aeolus side, I'm sure we'd be delighted to get feedback from the
> Katello project on the Image Factory API and template definition format.
>
Why would we just not call Image Factory directly?
That's what I meant ... terminology confusion, perhaps
Aeolus == umbrella of projects
Image Factory and Conductor == two of those projects
Image Factory API == Image Factory's QMF interface
Cheers,
Mark.