sinnykumari added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@sinnykumari
I would like to remove "name" key information for images unless it is currently
used somewhere. One of the reason of removing "name" key is that I am not sure
what should its value look like for iso
What do you mean by that? Because there is a name to the ostree iso's we generate,
for ex:
"atomic_dvd_ostree": {
"name": "Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-ppc64le-28-20180515.1.iso",
If we look at ["msg" content
produced](https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/id?id=2018-a3c04b19-...
by two week release script while using autocloud to fetch data, it contains both
"name" and "image_name" for each image type. For example:
```
atomic_vagrant_virtualbox": {
"image_name":
"Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180515.1.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box",
"compose_id": "Fedora-Atomic-28-20180515.1",
"name": "Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-28-20180515.1."
```
Here, it make sense to have "image_name" but I am not sure what is the
significance of having "name"? It looks to me that in "name", we just
trim off extensions (.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/392