What's new in Compiz 0.9? PS. 最近Ubuntu说要把Qt放到里面，这是一个招揽GNOME粉到Fedora的好时机，勇 敢地执行 yum remove qt* wine*吧！ 于 2011年01月19日 15:43, Liang Suilong 写道: > AdamW 和它的同伴已经把 Compiz 0.9 打好包了，放在 Fedora People 的 repo 上，有兴趣的朋友可以试试。 > > AdamW 还会跟他的团队慢慢把 Unity 界面带到 Fedora 的。不过尚需时日。 > > > Fedora&& Debian User, former Ubuntu User > My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info > Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager&& Ambassador > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Adam Williamson<awilliam(a)redhat.com> > Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:20 PM > Subject: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide > To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Quick note for Rawhide users: I am in the process of landing Compiz 0.9 > now. Adel and I have been testing the 0.9 migration in a side repo - > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/Compiz09/compiz09/ - for a while > now, and we're happy it's working pretty well. Note that we're using the > upstream 'compiz-with-glib-mainloop' branch: this contains some changes > that are needed for Unity, and will be merged into upstream master quite > soon. We agreed with Sam Spilsbury, the upstream compiz maintainer, that > it'd work out well for everyone if we help to test the glib-mainloop > changes in Rawhide to make sure they can be merged upstream faster. > > Quick summary of most important changes: > > * gconf configuration storage backend is deprecated > * configuration from compiz 0.8 will not migrate to 0.9; you'll have to > re-do your configuration > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at > the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop > (with panel, not Shell) > * use ccsm to configure Compiz, configuration done in ccsm will actually > work and be saved now > * KDE integration not tested yet > > Here's some more detailed notes on the changes: > > * We're deprecating gconf as a backend for storing Compiz/plugin > configurations. It's caused all sorts of problems over the years and is > more or less deprecated upstream, and gconf itself is going out as well. > Compiz may grow a dconf/gsettings backend, but in practice, it's > probably better to just use the flat-file (ccp) configuration system > anyway, it seems to be a lot less problematic. > > So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't > have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf > configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have to > make sure whatever method you use for launching compiz sets the 'gconf' > parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people > probably wind up using, one way or another, to launch compiz now > specifies 'ccp' not 'gconf'. I have tested the 'ccp' configuration > method quite carefully and can report that, contrary to how it's been in > Fedora for a while, Compiz configuration you set with ccsm actually > works now. :) I have not tested the gconf configuration storage backend, > and don't know if it works. I know ccsm 0.9 isn't actually capable of > storing configurations in gconf yet, so you'd have a tricky time using > it. It's deprecated. If it's not working, you get to keep both halves. > File a bug and we'll see what we can do. If you're wondering where the > flat-file configuration storage actually lives, it's in > ~/.config/compiz-1 . > > Configuration from 0.8 does not migrate to 0.9. You'll have to re-do > your configuration. This isn't a consequence of the gconf stuff > mentioned above, it's just an upstream change: for all config storage > backends, there was a clean break from 0.8 to 0.9 and configuration is > not carried over. Ubuntu has some patches which attempt to migrate 0.8 > configs to 0.9, but they're not 100% reliable and add time to each > startup, so they are not likely to be merged upstream, so we won't be > carrying them in Fedora. I'm afraid you'll have to re-do your > configuration with the 0.9 switch, if you have a custom compiz > configuration; sorry about that. > > desktop-effects is more or less deprecated now. It doesn't make a deal > of sense for Fedora 15+. It works on the basis of changing the > compositing and window managers for GNOME, and you can't really run > GNOME Shell with Compiz as the compositing manager; the paradigm just > isn't there. You can run 'classic GNOME' - with the gnome-panel instead > of GNOME Shell - with compiz and gtk-window-decorator, but that's a very > different experience from the Shell. The desktop team has said they > don't really think desktop-effects is appropriate any more, and they > won't be maintaining it. So what we've implemented instead is a desktop > session definition called 'Classic GNOME with Compiz'. That means that, > if you install the compiz-gnome package, then at the login manager - > gdm, kdm, whatever - you'll have the 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' session > listed as an option. This will start up a GNOME session with > gnome-panel, compiz and gtk-window-decorator, instead of the 'true' > GNOME 3, GNOME Shell-based experience. We felt this more appropriate to > the actual nature of the various choices in Fedora 15, and it's simpler > and more robust than what would have to be done to 'fix' desktop-effects > for GNOME 3. The current version of desktop-effects won't even launch > Compiz 0.9 properly, due to another bug; I could fix this (actually, I > already have, but it would need to go 'upstream') but it may not be > worth the trouble. Also, the 'cube' and 'wobbly windows' checkboxes in > desktop-effects won't work any more, as they used the gconf backend. > (Again, I have a patch for this - it just takes the checkboxes out - but > it may make more sense just to kill desktop-effects in F15). > > I haven't tested the KDE integration stuff yet, but I intend to. Does > anyone actually use Compiz with KDE 4? > > Please do report any bugs you come across, we'll be working with Sam to > try and make 0.9 as reliable as possible by F15 release time. Thanks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ > Chinese mailing list > Chinese at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chinese -- Mike. Blog: http://ekd123.is-programmer.com/ Fedora Project Contributor. _______________________________________________ Chinese mailing list Chinese at lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chinese

GTK的mplayer前端不是有gnome-mplayer么？ 于 2011年01月19日 16:23, Liang Suilong 写道: > SMplayer 太强悍了，暂时找不到要卸载的理由。Wine 和 Mono 我早就没有装了。要不 Mike 兄写个 GTK 的 Mplayer 前段吧。 > > Compiz 0.9 其实早就出了，只是 Fedora 这边没有人搞而已。0.9 好像是用 C 还是 C++ 重写过吧 > > Fedora&& Debian User, former Ubuntu User > My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info > Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager&& Ambassador > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong