Link to the removal in question:
https://gitorious.org/copyleft-next/copyleft-next/commit/5823daf41d2bbb75...
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn(a)ebb.org> wrote:
In particular, Fontana notes that it might be possible that the
acceptance clause is doing something different entirely unrelated to
bringing forth a contract claim.
Is the question to the list basically "is there anything else it is doing"
then?
I think there is some value to it for non-lawyers; i.e., helping them
understand that this is how they get the right to use the material.
But that's the only thing I can think of, and it's a stretch.
Luis