On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
To that end can someone provide:
* A lay review of copyleft-next 0.3.0's GPLv2 compatibility. Is
there anything that is obvious that makes it GPLv2 compatible ? If so
what is is? Is there anything that makes it questionable if it is
GPLv2 compatible? If so what is is?
* A lay review (perhaps a series of bullets) of what the main
advantages of copyleft-next 0.3.0 are over GPLv2
Hi Luis,
I can provide this, though I may not get to it for a couple of days.
For instance, since CRDA is already copyleft-next 0.3.0 licensed,
say I wanted to include code from it on a larger overall GPLv2
licensed code base, what are the implications if I did that to the
larger GPLv2 licensed body of code? Would just the GPLv2 apply only
on the larger body of code?
The code from CRDA would be licensed under both GPLv2 and
copyleft-next 0.3.0. The rest of the larger body of code would be
under GPLv2.
Richard