On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm
strongly
suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to
the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an
*active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the
Council or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks.
Does this sound more reasonable for you?
Just to reiterate from when I helped (?) start all this mess, I want to
see several things:
* Ambassadors — and therefore FAmSco — is very focused on traditional
Linux events and on Linux User Groups. We need to expand beyond that.
* Connect Ambassadors more closely to marketing, design, translation,
docs, and etc.
* Have somewhere that's a natural home — as well as governance and
leadership — for the parts of the project that are outside of
FESCo/Engineering.
I orginally called this "outreach" (as I was thinking of these
activities as largely facing out into the world), but I take Remy's
point that this has a bad collision with "outreach" as used
specifically about diversity. So if anyone has a better word, I'd love
to hear it. Fedora Non-Engineering Steering Committee? :)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader