On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:08:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
We need to revisit why it ultimately stalled then. I think
Matthew's
plans on documentation and purpose will help, but if it had traction
before and then fizzled out we need to avoid repeating that mistake
again.
Before, it was going to be specifically an RPM repository with more
relaxed packaging guidelines. That stalled because of the stuff Smooge
said. With COPR as successful as it is, I don't think we really need
that unified repository anyway. This incarnation is a lot more
lightweight — it isn't a specific service or anything; it's a brand.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader