January 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2261176] New: golang-github-bep-gowebp: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Feb '24

20 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261176 Bug ID: 2261176 Summary: golang-github-bep-gowebp: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-github-bep-gowebp Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, redhat(a)flyn.org Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora golang-github-bep-gowebp failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112276706 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix golang-github-bep-gowebp at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, golang-github-bep-gowebp will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, golang-github-bep-gowebp will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261176 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2260326] New: python-pygraphviz-1.11 FTBFS against SWIG 4.2.0
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Feb '24

20 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260326 Bug ID: 2260326 Summary: python-pygraphviz-1.11 FTBFS against SWIG 4.2.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: python-pygraphviz Severity: medium Assignee: zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, logans(a)cottsay.net, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The build of python-pygraphviz-1.11 is failing against SWIG 4.2.0 in Fedora rawhide/40. PR with fix for pygraphviz is prepared: https://github.com/pygraphviz/pygraphviz/pull/508 Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260326 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2262005] New: Several Nemo Extensions Cause nemo-extensions-list to Segfault
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262005 Bug ID: 2262005 Summary: Several Nemo Extensions Cause nemo-extensions-list to Segfault Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo-extensions/issues/51 3 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: nemo-extensions Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: notinsideofhereiamnotinside(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I posted the following on github, but this issue may be Fedora-specific (due to different versions of Python being used): After the changes introduced in commit f8cae9f nemo-extensions-list segfaults with "NameError: name '_' is not defined", when any of the following extensions are installed: nemo-audio-tab nemo-compare nemo-emblems nemo-media-columns nemo-pastebin nemo-terminal. This appears to be due to the underscore in the description line toward the end of each extension's [name].py file (which end up in /usr/share/nemo-python/extensions/ when installed). The segfault happens when nemo-extensions-list is executed from the command line, and via bringing up the plugins configuration window through Nemo itself. An easy fix is to remove the underscore from the offending line of each file (e.g. description = _("Allows file comparison from the context menu") becomes description = ("Allows file comparison from the context menu")), which I can confirm resolves the issue. I will be attaching patches shortly. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Execute nemo-extensions-list from the command line, or by bringing up the plugins configuration window through Nemo itself. Actual Results: Segfault, inability to manage extensions for Nemo, and inability to have the installed Nemo extensions listed. Expected Results: To see a list of Nemo extensions that are currently installed and be able to manage them from within Nemo's plugin configuration window. This occurs under Fedora 39 (Cinnamon Spin), and may have to do with the Python version in use (3.12.1). The release of Nemo being used here is 6.0.2, and the release of the nemo-extensions package is 6.0.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262005 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 14

[Bug 2249694] New: yarnpkg-1.22.21 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249694 Bug ID: 2249694 Summary: yarnpkg-1.22.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.22.20, 1.22.21 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.22.21 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.22.19-7.fc39 URL: https://yarnpkg.com Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13363/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yarnpkg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249694 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 1

[Bug 2261206] New: golang-x-vuln: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261206 Bug ID: 2261206 Summary: golang-x-vuln: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-x-vuln Assignee: asm(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org CC: asm(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora golang-x-vuln failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112294737 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix golang-x-vuln at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, golang-x-vuln will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, golang-x-vuln will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261206 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2183119] New: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72/2.73
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183119 Bug ID: 2183119 Summary: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72/2.73 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: All Status: NEW Component: ImageMagick Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: fberat(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Autoconf 2.72 (or 2.73) seems to be under preparation upstream, I therefore started to build dependent components against the pre-release [1] to verify that they can be built once it lands in Fedora. Your component fails to build with the new version of autoconf, due to the following error: configure:4837: error: possibly undefined macro: _AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_TEST_INCLUDES If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 Unfortunately, this can't be fixed with an autoreconf, an update of the files provided by gnulib are necessary. These files are usually added during the bootstrap of the source code, which is done to generate the release tarball. Please forward this to the community, and update the component accordingly. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2023-03/msg00020.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183119

1 2

[Bug 2261424] New: opengrm-ngram: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Feb '24

12 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261424 Bug ID: 2261424 Summary: opengrm-ngram: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: opengrm-ngram Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, redhat(a)flyn.org Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora opengrm-ngram failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112336206 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix opengrm-ngram at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, opengrm-ngram will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, opengrm-ngram will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261424 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2260777] New: matrix-synapse-1.100.0rc3 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Feb '24

10 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260777 Bug ID: 2260777 Summary: matrix-synapse-1.100.0rc3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: matrix-synapse Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: V02460(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: djc(a)djc.id.au, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)alex-m.co.uk, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, V02460(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.99.0rc1, 1.99.0, 1.100.0rc1, 1.100.0rc2, 1.100.0rc3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.100.0rc3 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.99.0-1.fc40 URL: https://github.com/element-hq/synapse Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15283/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/matrix-synapse -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260777 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 2172727] New: F38FailsToInstall: python3-cle
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Feb '24

10 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172727 Bug ID: 2172727 Summary: F38FailsToInstall: python3-cle Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW Component: python-cle Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, redhat(a)flyn.org Blocks: 2117177 (F38FailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (python-cle) Fails To Install in Fedora 38: can't install python3-cle: - nothing provides python3.11dist(pyvex) = 9.0.9572 needed by python3-cle-9.0.9572-4.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-38-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-cle P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117177 [Bug 2117177] Fedora 38 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172727

1 14

[Bug 2172728] New: F38FailsToInstall: python3-pyvex
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Feb '24

10 Feb '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172728 Bug ID: 2172728 Summary: F38FailsToInstall: python3-pyvex Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW Component: python-pyvex Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, redhat(a)flyn.org Blocks: 2117177 (F38FailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (python-pyvex) Fails To Install in Fedora 38: can't install python3-pyvex: - nothing provides python3.11dist(archinfo) = 9.2.32 needed by python3-pyvex-9.2.32-2.fc38.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-38-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-pyvex P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117177 [Bug 2117177] Fedora 38 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172728

1 15

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig January 2024