January 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2208213] New: Plugins for X3D & BVH doesn't compatible with Python 3.11
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208213 Bug ID: 2208213 Summary: Plugins for X3D & BVH doesn't compatible with Python 3.11 Product: Fedora Version: 37 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: blender Severity: medium Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: sunhaitao(a)devtaste.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The `open` function in Python 3.11 no longer supports 'U' mode. But it is still used in '/usr/share/blender/3.5/scripts/addons/io_anim_bvh/import_bvh.py' and '/usr/share/blender/3.5/scripts/addons/io_scene_x3d/import_x3d.py'. Reproducible: Always An upstream patch for this is avialable at 'https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender-addons/commit/eef2e476d384e463…'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208213

1 4

[Bug 2189474] New: [abrt] cinnamon: run(): utils.py:21:spawn:subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'chmod +x /home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox --No-Sandbox --Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop' returned non-zero exit status 1.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189474 Bug ID: 2189474 Summary: [abrt] cinnamon: run(): utils.py:21:spawn:subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'chmod +x /home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox --No-Sandbox --Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop' returned non-zero exit status 1. Product: Fedora Version: 37 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:78868997b76ba9dcde7249569f28c958a2e64e91;VAR IANT_ID=cinnamon; Component: cinnamon Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: ingobeh(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: cinnamon-5.6.8-2.fc37 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.4 cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope cmdline: python3 /usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py get_process 6372 crash_function: run exception_type: subprocess.CalledProcessError executable: /usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py interpreter: python3-3.11.3-1.fc37.x86_64 kernel: 6.2.12-200.fc37.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: Python3 uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: utils.py:21:spawn:subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'chmod +x /home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox --No-Sandbox --Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop' returned non-zero exit status 1. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py", line 15, in spawn process = subprocess.run( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 571, in run raise CalledProcessError(retcode, process.args, subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['chmod', '+x', '/home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox', '--No-Sandbox', '--Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop']' returned non-zero exit status 1. During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py", line 112, in <module> handle_cli() File "/usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py", line 105, in handle_cli spawn('chmod +x {}'.format(desktop_path)) File "/usr/share/cinnamon/applets/grouped-window-list(a)cinnamon.org/utils.py", line 21, in spawn raise subprocess.CalledProcessError(1, command) subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command 'chmod +x /home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox --No-Sandbox --Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop' returned non-zero exit status 1. Local variables in innermost frame: command: 'chmod +x /home/ingo/.local/share/applications/Rambox --No-Sandbox --Enable-Crashpad.cinnamon-generated.desktop' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189474

1 2

[Bug 2185995] New: CVE-2023-28484 mingw-libxml2: libxml2: NULL dereference in xmlSchemaFixupComplexType [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185995 Bug ID: 2185995 Summary: CVE-2023-28484 mingw-libxml2: libxml2: NULL dereference in xmlSchemaFixupComplexType [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: mingw-libxml2 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: rjones(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktietz(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185994 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185995

1 4

[Bug 2185987] New: CVE-2023-29469 mingw-libxml2: libxml2: Hashing of empty dict strings isn't deterministic [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185987 Bug ID: 2185987 Summary: CVE-2023-29469 mingw-libxml2: libxml2: Hashing of empty dict strings isn't deterministic [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: mingw-libxml2 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: rjones(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktietz(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185984 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185987

1 4

[Bug 2256997] New: gtk-layer-shell-0.8.2 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Jan '24

14 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256997 Bug ID: 2256997 Summary: gtk-layer-shell-0.8.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gtk-layer-shell Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.8.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.8.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.8.1-4.fc40 URL: https://github.com/wmww/gtk-layer-shell Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/198568/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtk-layer-shell -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256997 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2256445] New: python-pillow-10.2.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jan '24

13 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256445 Bug ID: 2256445 Summary: python-pillow-10.2.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-pillow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: manisandro(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 10.2.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 10.2.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 10.1.0-1.fc40 URL: http://python-pillow.github.io/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7974/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pillow -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256445 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2237050] New: rocksdb-8.5.3 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jan '24

13 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237050 Bug ID: 2237050 Summary: rocksdb-8.5.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: rocksdb Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: hegjon(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hegjon(a)gmail.com, mmuzila(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 8.3.3, 8.4.4, 8.5.3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 8.5.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 8.3.2-1.fc40 URL: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/15560/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocksdb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237050 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 21

[Bug 2237693] New: rocksdb should not BuildRequire /usr/bin/python3
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jan '24

13 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237693 Bug ID: 2237693 Summary: rocksdb should not BuildRequire /usr/bin/python3 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: rocksdb Assignee: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: lbalhar(a)redhat.com CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hegjon(a)gmail.com, mmuzila(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Packages in RHEL 8 should not use, Require or BuildRequire `/usr/bin/python3` because that file is provided by all the Python stacks - 3.6 (the main one), 3.8, 3.9, and 3.11. The particular version `/usr/bin/python3` points to depends on the system of alternatives and is determined either by the priority of the individual options or by manual setting by the system administrator. Python 3.6 has the highest priority, so if it is installed, `/usr/bin/python3` means Python 3.6 by default. However, when Python 3.6 is not installed, `/usr/bin/python3` can mean almost anything. Python 3.6 is the only Python in RHEL 8 with a full 10+ years of support and all system packages should depend on it. All other Python stacks have a shorter support period. If you wish to use an alternate Python version becasue the life cycle of your package allows you to do it, always choose that version explicitly rather than allowing dnf to pull in any Python version. Packages that Require `/usr/bin/python3` used to install Python 3.6 as a dependency by default, so for majority of use cases this problem never surfaced. However, python3.11 sort alphabetically sooner than python36, so users of RHEL 8.8 will get Python 3.11 by default when a package requires `/usr/bin/python3`. Please, switch the BuildRequires to `python3-devel` and make sure to always use %{python3} during the build when invoking Python rather than invoking `/usr/bin/python3`. If your need to, you can change shebangs by the %py3_shebang_fix macro. Shebangs of installed files are automatically mangled by `/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs`. It is absolutely essential that no RHEL 8 package Requires `/usr/bin/python3` on runtime. Even if you are confident that your code will work on any Python future version, it is not a good idea to support this for our customers. And also do not hesitate to let me know if you need any assistance or more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237693 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2179598] New: Icons not showing in themes
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179598 Bug ID: 2179598 Summary: Icons not showing in themes Product: Fedora Version: 37 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Component: gnome-icon-theme Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: jkopcak+fedoraproject(a)zohomail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, stefano(a)karapetsas.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Gnome icons do not appear in Themes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-18.fc37.noarch How reproducible: Always, Fedora Cinnamon 37 and up. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Menu 2. System Settings 3. Themes 4. Click the active "Icons" set Actual results: "gnome" icon set does not appear as an option. Expected results: Appear as an option in the list. Additional info: Fedora 36 system with gnome icons selected in Themes, then upgraded to 37, "gnome" is shown as the selected option for Icons after upgrade. Though shown as the active icon theme, it does not appear in the list and cannot be selected again once changed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179598

1 3

[Bug 2177329] New: fedpkg import srpm doesn't work with rpmautospec
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177329 Bug ID: 2177329 Summary: fedpkg import srpm doesn't work with rpmautospec Product: Fedora Version: 37 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Component: python-rpmautospec Severity: urgent Assignee: asaleh(a)redhat.com Reporter: gbcox(a)bzb.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: asaleh(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, nphilipp(a)redhat.com, sgallagh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: My workflow for uploading packages is: $ git add -u $ fedpkg clog $ git commit -F clog $ fedpkg import updated.srpm $ git commit --am ~~~ fedpkg push fedpkg build When trying this with a package that has been converted to use rpmautospec, it brakes the import srpm functionality. I receive the following message: Could not execute import_srpm: SRPM was processed by rpmautospec (specfile msmtp.spec" was analyzed) fedpkg import is a key function so this needs to be corrected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177329

1 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig January 2024