January 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2255116] New: [abrt] gnome-calendar: gtk_list_box_row_get_child(): gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '25

28 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255116 Bug ID: 2255116 Summary: [abrt] gnome-calendar: gtk_list_box_row_get_child(): gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ca7a59a53752557e80062383671d27cc665e7a45;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: gnome-calendar Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: eazel7(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.11 type: CCpp reason: gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV journald_cursor: s=3452a52fb1ca43a28acf90fd9dda0129;i=33aaf;b=cb83aca6892849e3b74afa430acf9ff8;m=15f98ec181;t=60ccc6150421e;x=607631cee761312 executable: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar cmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar --gapplication-service cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/app.slice/dbus-:1.2-org.gnome.Calendar@1.service rootdir: / uid: 1000 kernel: 6.6.6-200.fc39.x86_64 package: gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39 runlevel: N 5 dso_list: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39.x86_64 (Fedora Project) 1702679189 backtrace_rating: 4 crash_function: gtk_list_box_row_get_child Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (8 frames) #0 gtk_list_box_row_get_child at ../gtk/gtklistbox.c:3009 #1 gcal_agenda_view_remove_event at ../src/gui/views/gcal-agenda-view.c:585 #2 remove_event_from_subscriber at ../src/core/gcal-timeline.c:255 #3 timeline_source_dispatch at ../src/core/gcal-timeline.c:774 #5 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4284 #6 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked.isra.0 at ../glib/gmain.c:4349 #7 g_main_context_iteration at ../glib/gmain.c:4414 #8 g_application_run at ../gio/gapplication.c:2577 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255116 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2239437] New: gnome-calendar-45.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '25

28 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239437 Bug ID: 2239437 Summary: gnome-calendar-45.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gnome-calendar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 45.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 45.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 45~rc-1.fc40 URL: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Calendar Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10906/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239437 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 16

[Bug 2256783] New: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 May '25

22 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Bug ID: 2256783 Summary: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: gmime Severity: medium Assignee: alexl(a)redhat.com Reporter: fberat(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The component fails to build with autoconf 2.72 due to its use of Autoconf internal variables in its configure.ac file. the following section needs to be adapted (or better removed): dnl ************************************* dnl *** Checks for large file support *** dnl ************************************* AC_ARG_ENABLE([largefile], AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-largefile], [enable support for large files [[default=yes]]]),, [enable_largefile="yes"]) [...] if test "x$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" != "xno"; then LFS_CFLAGS="$LFS_CFLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" enable_largefile="yes" fi else LFS_CFLAGS="" fi AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_LARGEFILE, test "x$enable_largefile" = "xyes") The main problem of this section being the check against `$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits` which no longer exists. Leading to further failures. AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS if necessary. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2261273] New: kdiagram: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261273 Bug ID: 2261273 Summary: kdiagram: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: kdiagram Assignee: rdieter(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kde-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rdieter(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora kdiagram failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112305564 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix kdiagram at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, kdiagram will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, kdiagram will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261273 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2261228] New: gupnp: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261228 Bug ID: 2261228 Summary: gupnp: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gupnp Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora gupnp failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112297922 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix gupnp at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, gupnp will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, gupnp will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261228 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2261225] New: gtksourceview3: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261225 Bug ID: 2261225 Summary: gtksourceview3: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gtksourceview3 Assignee: mclasen(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, icq(a)gnome.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora gtksourceview3 failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112297376 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix gtksourceview3 at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, gtksourceview3 will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, gtksourceview3 will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261225 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2261160] New: gnome-calendar: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261160 Bug ID: 2261160 Summary: gnome-calendar: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gnome-calendar Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora gnome-calendar failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112273094 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix gnome-calendar at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, gnome-calendar will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, gnome-calendar will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261160 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2260129] New: Update Package Versioning Strategy & Version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260129 Bug ID: 2260129 Summary: Update Package Versioning Strategy & Version Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: spirv-headers Severity: medium Assignee: airlied(a)redhat.com Reporter: jonathansteffan(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jexposit(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora As part of the update to vulkan 1.3.275.0, spirv-headers also needs to be updated. Please consider changing the versioning format to more closely match the rest of the vulkan packages. This patch adds an epoch and changes the versioning strategy. It also bumps the version to prepare for the rest of the updates. --- a/spirv-headers.spec +++ b/spirv-headers.spec @@ -1,15 +1,13 @@ -%global commit e867c06631767a2d96424cbec530f9ee5e78180f -%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7}) - Name: spirv-headers -Version: 1.5.5 +Version: 1.3.275.0 +Epoch: 1 Release: %autorelease Summary: Header files from the SPIR-V registry License: MIT URL: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Headers/ -Source0: %{url}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz +Source0: %url/archive/vulkan-sdk-%{version}.tar.gz#/SPIRV-Headers-sdk-%{version}.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch @@ -42,7 +40,7 @@ This includes: * The XML registry fil %prep -%autosetup -n SPIRV-Headers-%{commit} +%autosetup -n SPIRV-Headers-vulkan-sdk-%{version} chmod a-x include/spirv/1.2/spirv.py Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260129 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2254021] New: Why is cinnamon package summary / description "Window management and application launching for GNOME"?
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254021 Bug ID: 2254021 Summary: Why is cinnamon package summary / description "Window management and application launching for GNOME"? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: cinnamon Severity: low Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: rdkracz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora "Window management and application launching for GNOME". GNOME? I looked over at pkgs.org and Fedora is the only distribution that uses the word GNOME in the package description/summary Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: dnf se cinnamon Actual Results: cinnamon.x86_64 : Window management and application launching for GNOME Expected Results: cinnamon.x86_64 : Window management and application launching for Cinnamon or "Fork of GNOME Shell with layout similar to GNOME 2" / "GNOME3 fork of Linux Mint with GNOME2 aspect" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254021 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2241490] New: python-zarr: FTBFS on s390x
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241490 Bug ID: 2241490 Summary: python-zarr: FTBFS on s390x Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: python-zarr Severity: low Assignee: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Reporter: code(a)musicinmybrain.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The python-zarr package fails to build from source on s390x builders due to several test failures, presumably due to little-endian assumptions in zarr or its dependencies. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. fedpkg co python-zarr 2. cd python-zarr 3. fedpkg scratch-build --arches s390x Actual Results: FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithN5Store::test_hexdigest - Assert... FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithN5FSStore::test_hexdigest - Asse... FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithCustomMapping::test_nbytes_stored FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_1d FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_1d_fill_value FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_1d_selections FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_2d FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_2d_edge_case FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_2d_partial FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_array_order FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_resize_2d FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_append_2d FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_append_2d_axis FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_np_ufuncs FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_iter - ... FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_islice FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_non_cont FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_read_nitems_less_than_blocksize_from_multiple_chunks FAILED zarr/tests/test_core.py::TestArrayWithFSStorePartialRead::test_read_from_all_blocks FAILED zarr/tests/test_storage.py::test_format_compatibility - AssertionError... === 20 failed, 2781 passed, 2324 skipped, 8 xfailed, 194 warnings in 59.50s ==== Expected Results: All tests pass; successful build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241490 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig January 2024