May 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2283292] New: The directories /usr/lib64/llvm15/ and/usr/lib64/llvm15/lib/ are not in the RPM database.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Apr '25

27 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283292 Bug ID: 2283292 Summary: The directories /usr/lib64/llvm15/ and/usr/lib64/llvm15/lib/ are not in the RPM database. Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: llvm15 Severity: medium Assignee: tuliom(a)redhat.com Reporter: pampelmuse(a)gmx.at CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora-llvm-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, tuliom(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The directories /usr/lib64/llvm15/ and/usr/lib64/llvm15/lib/ are not in the RPM database. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -qf /usr/lib64/llvm15 file /usr/lib64/llvm15 is not owned by any package 2. rpm -qf /usr/lib64/llvm15/lib/ file /usr/lib64/llvm15/lib is not owned by any package Actual Results: not owned by any package Expected Results: llvm15-libs-15.0.7-7.fc40.x86_64 Same for /usr/lib64/llvm16 /usr/lib64/llvm16/lib and /usr/lib64/llvm17 /usr/lib64/llvm17/lib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283292 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2278107] New: The avr32 target is not 32-bit avr. It's 8-bit avr
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Apr '25

26 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278107 Bug ID: 2278107 Summary: The avr32 target is not 32-bit avr. It's 8-bit avr Product: Fedora Version: 40 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: cross-gcc Severity: low Assignee: dhowells(a)redhat.com Reporter: asgj(a)gomspace.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dan(a)danny.cz, dhowells(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lkundrak(a)v3.sk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I am currently stuck with some legacy hardware based on the AT32UC0512C 32-bit avr MCU and stumbled opun this package by accident and got very excited as the official atmel/Microchip gcc compiler distribution is based on a very old gcc version (4.4.7). Opun further investigation, it seems that this was just a wild goose chase / red herring as the package simply wraps --target=avr-linux, which is just 8-bit avr. I'm not sure what to to about this. Perhaps rename the package to avoid further confusion, or if there's a rationale behind the naming, maybe update the package description from "Cross-build binary utilities for avr32-linux-gnu" to "Cross-build binary utilities for avr32-linux-gnu (8-bit avr)" or something similar. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278107 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2281507] New: CVE-2024-34083 python-aiosmtpd: aiosmtpd: servers based on aiosmtpd accept extra unencrypted commands [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Apr '25

25 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281507 Bug ID: 2281507 Summary: CVE-2024-34083 python-aiosmtpd: aiosmtpd: servers based on aiosmtpd accept extra unencrypted commands [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 40 Status: NEW Component: python-aiosmtpd Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: aurelien(a)bompard.org Reporter: ybuenos(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aurelien(a)bompard.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, psimovec(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281505 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281507 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2281497] New: CVE-2024-35190 asterisk: wrongly matches ALL unauthorized SIP requests [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Apr '25

25 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281497 Bug ID: 2281497 Summary: CVE-2024-35190 asterisk: wrongly matches ALL unauthorized SIP requests [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 40 Status: NEW Component: asterisk Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: ybuenos(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bennie.joubert(a)jsdaav.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com, rbryant(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281495 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281497 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2280857] New: [abrt] cinnamon: __call__(): Gio.py:349:__call__:gi.repository.GLib.GError: g-io-error-quark: GDBus.Error:org.gnome.gjs.JSError.TypeError: type is undefined (36)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Apr '25

25 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280857 Bug ID: 2280857 Summary: [abrt] cinnamon: __call__(): Gio.py:349:__call__:gi.repository.GLib.GError: g-io-error-quark: GDBus.Error:org.gnome.gjs.JSError.TypeError: type is undefined (36) Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:fc69d83853bbb5ba6357513c90c6eb0168652112;VAR IANT_ID=cinnamon; Component: cinnamon Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: filmfan2142(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.15 kernel: 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86_64 cmdline: cinnamon-settings '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-5.scope uid: 1000 reason: Gio.py:349:__call__:gi.repository.GLib.GError: g-io-error-quark: GDBus.Error:org.gnome.gjs.JSError.TypeError: type is undefined (36) executable: /usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/cinnamon-settings.py type: Python3 package: cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40 runlevel: N 5 exception_type: gi.repository.GLib.GError crash_function: __call__ interpreter: cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40.x86_64 Truncated backtrace: Gio.py:349:__call__:gi.repository.GLib.GError: g-io-error-quark: GDBus.Error:org.gnome.gjs.JSError.TypeError: type is undefined (36) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/bin/Spices.py", line 781, in _install_finished self.send_proxy_signal('ReloadXlet', '(ss)', uuid, self.collection_type.upper()) File "/usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/bin/Spices.py", line 270, in send_proxy_signal getattr(self._proxy, command)(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/gi/overrides/Gio.py", line 349, in __call__ result = self.dbus_proxy.call_sync(self.method_name, arg_variant, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ gi.repository.GLib.GError: g-io-error-quark: GDBus.Error:org.gnome.gjs.JSError.TypeError: type is undefined (36) Local variables in innermost frame: self: <gi.overrides.Gio._DBusProxyMethodCall object at 0x7ff24887ef90> args: ('CBlack', 'THEME') kwargs: {} signature: '(ss)' arg_variant: GLib.Variant('(ss)', ('CBlack', 'THEME')) Potential duplicate: bug 2035596 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280857 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 1

[Bug 2249131] New: python-terminado-0.18.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249131 Bug ID: 2249131 Summary: python-terminado-0.18.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-terminado Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: orion(a)nwra.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, orion(a)nwra.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, TicoTimo(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.18.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.18.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.17.1-6.fc39 URL: https://github.com/jupyter/terminado Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13390/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-terminado -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249131 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 7

[Bug 2261494] New: golang-mvdan-gofumpt-0.6.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Apr '25

13 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261494 Bug ID: 2261494 Summary: golang-mvdan-gofumpt-0.6.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-mvdan-gofumpt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: asm(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: asm(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.6.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.6.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.5.0-4.fc40 URL: https://github.com/mvdan/gofumpt Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/205652/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-mvdan-gofumpt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261494 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2283800] New: Integrate Valkey with SELinux
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 Apr '25

03 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283800 Bug ID: 2283800 Summary: Integrate Valkey with SELinux Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: valkey Keywords: SELinux Severity: high Assignee: jonathan(a)almalinux.org Reporter: fedora(a)joshuanoeske.de CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, nathans(a)redhat.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Currently, valkey runs with security context 'unconfined_service_t'. Moreover, the file context of the standard directory for unix sockets (/var/run/valkey) is 'var_run_t'. In comparison, redis runs with context 'redis_t', its socket directory (/var/run/redis) uses 'redis_var_run_t'. This has several implications for using unix sockets. Firstly, httpd/php-fpm is not allowed to access the unix socket in /var/run/valkey as is has the wrong file context. See the following SELinux message: type=AVC msg=audit(1716984122.216:1041): avc: denied { write } for pid=7316 comm="php-fpm" name="valkey.sock" dev="tmpfs" ino=2973 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file permissive=0 /var/run/redis automatically has the file context redis_var_run_t. However, if you managed to make valkey use /var/run/redis, which is a problem in itself (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283798) it still does not work because the socket was created by a process running unconfined. See the following error message (it is from valkey's socket, I renamed the socket to redis-server.sock to try if that makes a difference): type=AVC msg=audit(1716985343.79:1314): avc: denied { connectto } for pid=7315 comm="php-fpm" path="/run/redis/redis-server.sock" scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket permissive=0 This makes valkey for me completely unusable at the moment. I will maybe try to generate my own SELinux policy with audit2allow, eventually, but for now, I will switch back to redis. Maybe the existing contexts from redis can be reused? Or can new ones be created with valkey in their name instead of redis, but which basically function exactly like the redis contexts? Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283800 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 15

[Bug 2256713] New: Please branch and build ImageMagick in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713 Bug ID: 2256713 Summary: Please branch and build ImageMagick in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: ImageMagick Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: bzuelly(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build ImageMagick in epel9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2180613] New: Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613 Bug ID: 2180613 Summary: Feature Request: compile blender with oneAPI support for Cycles Product: Fedora Version: 38 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: blender Severity: medium Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: koppe(a)posteo.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, negativo17(a)gmail.com, promac(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora With Intel Level Zero now available in the Fedora repositories, I think the version of Blender shipped with Fedora should be compiled with Cycles oneAPI support for Intel GPUs enabled, currently only CUDA and HIP are enabled -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180613

1 21

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig May 2024