Thomas,
I based my large range of ports on a recent bug filed at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983088#c9
I am reviewing the other emails that came from Laine Stump...
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Thomas Woerner <twoerner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello John,
On 10/30/2013 12:45 AM, John Call wrote:
> Given the popularity of virtualization these days, I'd like to see a
> SPICE service definition file come "out-of-the-box" with firewalld. Is
> this something that could be approached at this level, or would should
> the request be directed to the libvirt/qemu team? For example, I think
> the definition below should be shipped as predefined/standard service.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <service>
> <short>Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments
> (SPICE)</short>
> <description>SPICE is an adaptive remote rendering protocol for
> virtual environments. The range of allowed ports will allow up to 256
> concurrent remote console sessions to running virtual
> machines.</description>
> <port protocol="tcp" port="5900-6411"/>
>
This is really a huge port range. There are lots of ports in this range
that are not SPICE specific.
Can you provide a list of ports that is used only for SPICE?
</service>
>
> Thanks for your consideration,
> John
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> firewalld-users mailing list
>
firewalld-users@lists.**fedorahosted.org<firewalld-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/**firewalld-users<ht...
>
>
Regards,
Thomas
______________________________**_________________
firewalld-users mailing list
firewalld-users@lists.**fedorahosted.org<firewalld-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/**firewalld-users<ht...