January 2016 - golang - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1227708] New: Provide an additional sub-package with a skydns binary

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227708 Bug ID: 1227708 Summary: Provide an additional sub-package with a skydns binary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: golang-github-skynetservices-skydns Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com Reporter: lemenkov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com, lsm5(a)redhat.com Hello! This packagew right now provides only a devel-package, totally ignoring its one of the main purposes - skydns binary. Let's modify the package and introduce an additional sub-package - with skydns executable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 --- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> --- > Jan, thanks, good to see the progress. I'm wondering why not package a main > repo release version, like v1.1.3?(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #1) Due to a lack of more powerful integration testing. In future, it can change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1145659] New: [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145659 Bug ID: 1145659 Summary: [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: docker-io Assignee: lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: walters(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, dwalsh(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hushan.jia(a)gmail.com, jperrin(a)centos.org, lsm5(a)fedoraproject.org, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, s(a)shk.io, thrcka(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com, virt-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1144206 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144206 [Bug 1144206] [PATCH] Support /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1096296] New: man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096296 Bug ID: 1096296 Summary: man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Version: 7.1 Component: docker Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com QA Contact: virt-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com, whenry(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1087697 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1087697 +++ Description of problem: Hi guys, the man page states: --sig-proxy=true: Proxify all received signal to the process (even in non-tty mode) But the real behavior is, that sig-proxy doesn't work when --tty=true. It should be mentioned in there, taht --sig-proxy is incompatible with --tty. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-io-0.9.1-1.fc21.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. man docker Actual results: man page says it works even in non-tty Expected results: man page warns that --tty can't be used with --sig-proxy How to verify: 1. docker run --tty=true -i --rm fedora bash -c 'for NUM in `seq 1 64`; do trap "echo Received $NUM, ignoring..." $NUM; done; while :; do sleep 1; done' 2. ps -ax | grep docker 3. kill -SIGUSR1 $PID 4. (with --tty=true no signals are received, when you try the same with --tty=false, signals are proxified and messages are displayed) --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2014-04-15 02:11:48 EDT --- Copying William (he recently got per subcommand manpages merged upstream). this seems to be the case even in the latest manpage (I'm guessing this was inherited from the original manpage). William, was there any discussion about this in your PR? --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2014-04-15 02:15:31 EDT --- btw, the 0.10 rpm includes the latest manpages (should be in yum soon) --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-04-15 04:45:55 EDT --- Thanks for a quick reply. I tried the docker-io-0.10.0-2.fc20.x86_64 which says: --sig-proxy=true|false: When set to true, proxify all received signals to the process (even in non-tty mode). The default is true. I'd really like to change it to "only in non-tty" with possible warning that --tty=true is incompatible with --sig-proxy. --- Additional comment from William Henry on 2014-04-30 15:54:25 EDT --- I go this text from upstream. I'll check. --- Additional comment from William Henry on 2014-04-30 16:02:22 EDT --- Lukas,according to the folks upstream, this is a bug in docker run and attach. It should be as the text suggests. Can you file a bug upstream with docker? Here: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues Please just take the information you posted above and post it there. Thanks. Well spotted. Best, William --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-02 04:02:01 EDT --- Upstream tracer: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/5547 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087697 [Bug 1087697] man page inaccuracy about --sig-proxy and --tty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
21
0 / 0

[Bug 1096276] New: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096276 Bug ID: 1096276 Summary: signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Version: 7.1 Component: docker Assignee: lsm5(a)redhat.com Reporter: ldoktor(a)redhat.com QA Contact: virt-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, golang(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lsm5(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, mgoldman(a)redhat.com, skottler(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1087720 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1087720 +++ Description of problem: When I send signal 27 to the docker process, which is running with --sig-proxy=true, it's not forwarded. Other signals are... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): docker-0.10.0-8.el7.x86_64 docker-io-0.9.1-1.fc21.x86_64 upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. /usr/bin/docker -D run --tty=false --rm -i --name test_eoly localhost:5000/ldoktor/fedora:latest bash -c 'for NUM in `seq 1 64`; do trap "echo Received $NUM, ignoring..." $NUM; done; while :; do sleep 1; done' 2. ps ax |grep docker 3. kill -27 $PID Actual results: nothing Expected results: Received 27, ignoring... Additional info: When you send any other signal (apart from 19 or 9) it works fine. --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-04-15 04:59:24 EDT --- The signal 17 is also ignored. --- Additional comment from Lukas Doktor on 2014-05-05 03:48:25 EDT --- The same bug is in upstream Docker version 0.10.0, build dc9c28f/0.10.0 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087720 [Bug 1087720] signal 27 (SIGPROF) not passed to container using --sig-proxy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
26
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 --- Comment #3 from Kiran Nagaraja <kiran.nagaraja(a)ericsson.com> --- Jan, thanks, good to see the progress. I'm wondering why not package a main repo release version, like v1.1.3?(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #1) > The current stability of kubernetes is still in a question. The current > kubernetes is built from openshift's source codes. More precisely, from > source code in Godeps/_workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes directory which > replaces the current kubernetes code. It is pure kubernetes + patches no yet > in upstream. The aim is to provide more stable component and to be as much > close as possible to the latest release. > > In general, kubernetes in Fedora miss proper testing which would discover > regressions and other issues. I will provide the latest build we have in > rawhide branch. However, it will be kept in updates-testing for quite some > time before it gets proper testing. So any test you can run on kubernetes is > welcomed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- kubernetes-1.2.0-0.4.alpha1.git4c8e6f4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-57b96b46e3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|kubernetes-1.2.0-0.3.alpha1 |kubernetes-1.2.0-0.4.alpha1 |.git4c8e6f4.fc23 |.git4c8e6f4.fc23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |kubernetes-1.2.0-0.3.alpha1 | |.git4c8e6f4.fc23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1291860] Packaged old version (1.06) of kubernetes in most recent release. kubernetes rpm labeled 1.1xxxx

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup(a)redhat.com> --- The current stability of kubernetes is still in a question. The current kubernetes is built from openshift's source codes. More precisely, from source code in Godeps/_workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes directory which replaces the current kubernetes code. It is pure kubernetes + patches no yet in upstream. The aim is to provide more stable component and to be as much close as possible to the latest release. In general, kubernetes in Fedora miss proper testing which would discover regressions and other issues. I will provide the latest build we have in rawhide branch. However, it will be kept in updates-testing for quite some time before it gets proper testing. So any test you can run on kubernetes is welcomed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang January 2016