Andrew Overholt writes:
* Andrew Haley <aph(a)redhat.com> [2007-10-05 09:01]:
> Andrew Overholt writes:
> > * Andrew Haley <aph(a)redhat.com> [2007-10-05 08:47]:
> > > So, why don't I just patch IcedTea to use your values as defaults?
> >
> > That would be awesome. I think Tom Fitzsimmons might actually have some
> > better values, but anything higher would rock.
>
> Alright, so I need to do the experiment:
>
> Duplicate the failures -- you must tell me exactly what to do.
>
> Rebuild with new values.
>
> Confirm that the failures no longer happen.
It may be easier for me to do this. Josh Sumali can help as well as he
can now reliably crash Eclipse within a few minutes. It's difficult to
reproduce with a simple "run these steps" and even with a large
workspace, I find it happens erratically.
OK, I'll make two packages, one with and one without the patch. Which
arch do you prefer?
When was the last time I told you something was wrong and it was easy
to
reproduce? :)
Uh, yeah.
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903