Jane Dogalt (jdogalt(a)yahoo.com) said:
> > 2) unionfs via initramfs (forget read-only root)
>
> Since unionfs isn't in the Fedora kernels, it's not really something we
> can count on right now. And there are significant concerns about it
> from some of our kernel developers that are likely to keep it from being
> a good option.
Can you enumerate at least a couple of those concerns? I see huge advantages,
which have caused several livecd projects to already utilize it. I don't mind
kadischi opting not to use unionfs, but I would like to know why.
Flaming pile of deadlocking goo when testing here, including causing
panics after it failed to mount.
Bill