On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:16:51 -0400
Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:53:14 +0200
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> wrote:
> How come it would now /require/ pykickstart >= 1.13 if it's a
> try/except/pass for pykickstart < 1.13?
Well, the try/except/pass wasn't for backwards compat, it was because
if you ask pykickstart to do a methodToRepo and your method is
anything other than "url" you'll get a traceback.
Although I suppose that this will work for backwards compat too, it's
just a different failure mode, one hidden by my lazyness in just
excepting everything there.
One example where laziness has a positive side-effect :)
Looks fine, though I'm going to drop the requires bump. Forcing an
upgrade for it just feels unnecessary.
Jeremy