Re: Dropping recipe_eval

Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:45:18PM CEST, jpirko(a)redhat.com wrote: > Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:56:13PM CEST, rpazdera(a)redhat.com wrote: >> What is your opinion on keeping recipe_eval options >> in LNST? The same functionality can be now accessed >> using a predefined template variable $recipe. For instance: >> >> {$recipe["machines"][1]["info"]["hostname"]} >> >> So the older way is not needed any more.In my opinion, it >> would be better to stick to one way of accessing the recipe >> to maintain consistency among the recipes, but dropping >> recipe_eval entirely, could break some older ones. >> >> What do you think? We could either drop it entirely or >> keep it in as "undocumented". > > Let's just drop it. Breakups can be easily fixed. > I agree. No need to have it there. Also documentation should be updated to reflect this change (simply delete/substitute the references to recipe_eval).

>> Radek >> _______________________________________________ >> LNST-developers mailing list >> LNST-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org >> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/lnst-developers > _______________________________________________ > LNST-developers mailing list > LNST-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/lnst-developers