September 2012 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 --- Comment #13 from Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> --- This issue affects the versions of the gdb package, as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6. -- This issue affects the versions of the gdb package, as shipped with Fedora release of 16 and 17. Please schedule an update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jlieskov(a)redhat.c | |om) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org, | |lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, | |rjones(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: mingw Digest, Vol 48, Issue 31

by kees de jong

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:13 +0000 mingw-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > Send mingw mailing list submissions to > mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > mingw-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > mingw-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of mingw digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. gtk+ compiling with mingw64 (kees de jong) > 2. Re: gtk+ compiling with mingw64 (Erik van Pienbroek) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:44:49 +0000 > From: kees de jong <omekeesje(a)ziggo.nl> > To: mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: gtk+ compiling with mingw64 > Message-ID: <20120923154449.ab0ff9950ec15237acb844b7(a)ziggo.nl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Hello everybody, > A couple of weeks ago I installed fedora because my > Debian did not(yet?) support the mingw64-gtk+ library etc. > I installed all the needed stuff for compiling gtk+ programs > with the mingw64 crosscompiler, > (I have written gtk+ programs for about 10 years, so I think > I know what I am doing), but I missed the necessary information > about environmentvariables etc. > At last I found with some luck in my aliases the coms: mingw32-env > and mingw64.env. > After running one of those I tried to compile some of the programs > of the mingw64-gtk+ demo directory. > I did this both with the 32bits (i86) environment and library > as well as with the 64bits idem, in both cases with and without > the --static option for pkg-config. > The compiler returned for the 32bits version the following error: > undefined reference to WinMain@16, > and for the 64bits version: > undefined reference to WinMain. > This happened with static- as well as dynamically linked compiling. > I think I must have made some mistake somewhere, but there is, > as far as I know, no documentation to put me right. > Maybe there is someone in this forum who can give me a hint? > Has someone succeeded in compiling the gtk+-demo-programs? > Greetings, > Kees de Jong > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:22:46 +0200 > From: Erik van Pienbroek <erik(a)vanpienbroek.nl> > To: mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: gtk+ compiling with mingw64 > Message-ID: > <1348410166.30452.8.camel(a)erik-laptop.terneuzen.openftd.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi Kees, > > It isn't necessary to cross-compile gtk+ yourself when using Fedora. > We're already providing packages for both gtk2 and gtk3. The package > names for them are mingw32-gtk2, mingw64-gtk2, mingw32-gtk3 and > mingw64-gtk3. You can install them with one of the various package > managers which are available in Fedora. > > The gtk-demo binary is also provided by these packages > > For a basic introduction in the Fedora MinGW toolchain and how it can be > used can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Tutorial > > When you install one or the gtk+ packages I mentioned earlier and use > the commands described in the tutorial you should be able to build your > own application against the cross-compiled gtk+ stack. > > If you've got any other questions about the Fedora MinGW cross-compiler > stack feel free to let us know using this mailing list of join us on > IRC: irc.freenode.net/#fedora-mingw > > Groeten, > > Erik van Pienbroek > > > kees de jong schreef op zo 23-09-2012 om 15:44 [+0000]: > > Hello everybody, > > A couple of weeks ago I installed fedora because my > > Debian did not(yet?) support the mingw64-gtk+ library etc. > > I installed all the needed stuff for compiling gtk+ programs > > with the mingw64 crosscompiler, > > (I have written gtk+ programs for about 10 years, so I think > > I know what I am doing), but I missed the necessary information > > about environmentvariables etc. > > At last I found with some luck in my aliases the coms: mingw32-env > > and mingw64.env. > > After running one of those I tried to compile some of the programs > > of the mingw64-gtk+ demo directory. > > I did this both with the 32bits (i86) environment and library > > as well as with the 64bits idem, in both cases with and without > > the --static option for pkg-config. > > The compiler returned for the 32bits version the following error: > > undefined reference to WinMain@16, > > and for the 64bits version: > > undefined reference to WinMain. > > This happened with static- as well as dynamically linked compiling. > > I think I must have made some mistake somewhere, but there is, > > as far as I know, no documentation to put me right. > > Maybe there is someone in this forum who can give me a hint? > > Has someone succeeded in compiling the gtk+-demo-programs? > > Greetings, > > Kees de Jong > > _______________________________________________ > > mingw mailing list > > mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > mingw mailing list > mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw > > End of mingw Digest, Vol 48, Issue 31 > ************************************* Hallo Erik, Thanks for your very prompt reaction on my question! The problem I had, came as I have found, from a very silly mistake I have made. I tried to compile c-progams from the demo directory in the gtk-package, but that will not do, because all of those programs are without the, for c nessecary main(....) function, so it is not possible to compile them into executables. In the mean time I succeeded in compiling one of my own programs and running it on win7. Sorry for the stupid question! But maybe You can tell me now of- and how it is possible to compile my progam statically with the gtk+-library ( I dont like putting all those ddl's on windows because that hinders easy portability) The things I tried (cc option -static and/or pkg-config option --static) both failed. Veel dank, Kees de Jong

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

gtk+ compiling with mingw64

by kees de jong

Hello everybody, A couple of weeks ago I installed fedora because my Debian did not(yet?) support the mingw64-gtk+ library etc. I installed all the needed stuff for compiling gtk+ programs with the mingw64 crosscompiler, (I have written gtk+ programs for about 10 years, so I think I know what I am doing), but I missed the necessary information about environmentvariables etc. At last I found with some luck in my aliases the coms: mingw32-env and mingw64.env. After running one of those I tried to compile some of the programs of the mingw64-gtk+ demo directory. I did this both with the 32bits (i86) environment and library as well as with the 64bits idem, in both cases with and without the --static option for pkg-config. The compiler returned for the 32bits version the following error: undefined reference to WinMain@16, and for the 64bits version: undefined reference to WinMain. This happened with static- as well as dynamically linked compiling. I think I must have made some mistake somewhere, but there is, as far as I know, no documentation to put me right. Maybe there is someone in this forum who can give me a hint? Has someone succeeded in compiling the gtk+-demo-programs? Greetings, Kees de Jong

11 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 756776] Review Request: mingw-libosinfo - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-09-23 01:05:57 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-libosinfo-0.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 754437] Review Request: mingw-libvirt-glib - libvirt glib integration for event

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-09-23 01:04:19 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-libvirt-glib-0.1.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng

by Fedora Koji Build System

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng

by Fedora Koji Build System

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 833623] Review Request: mingw-nettle - MinGW package for nettle cryptographic library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-nettle-2.4-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

11 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw September 2012