Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573

--- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com 2012-04-15 12:59:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)

The following lines are obsolete and can be removed: %global mingw_build_win32 1 %global mingw_build_win64 1

Done. Could you also update the Fedora wiki for MinGW packaging? You change the packaging requirements every time I submit a package for review. The wiki is highly out of date.

Please bump the BR: mingw32-filesystem and mingw64-filesystem to >= 95

The BR: pkgconfig can be removed as it's already part of the default build root in Fedora

The BR: mingw32-libjpeg and mingw64-libjpeg can be changed to mingw32-libjpeg-turbo and mingw64-libjpeg-turbo as there are no mingw32-libjpeg or mingw64-libjpeg packages in Fedora any more (they are replaced by mingw-libjpeg-turbo)

The BR: mingw32-orc and mingw64-orc can't be satisfied at the moment as the package mingw-orc isn't available in Fedora at the moment, so that package needs to be put up for review first

The %{mingw_pkg_name} macro is currently obsolete. Please use the full package name in the places where this macro is used

Done.

The Summary: %{summary} tags (in the subpackages) don't give the expected result. Please don't use the %{summary} tag

The debug package macro causes this. Moved it.

The quotes used by the various arguments in the %mingw_configure aren't needed any more and can be removed. This %mingw_configure line can also be split among multiple lines to improve readability

Please use the %mingw_find_lang macro instead of the %find_lang macro. This macro generates two file lists named mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-good.lang and mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-good.lang with translations for mingw32 and mingw64 packages, so don't forget to also update the %files tags

Done.

Why are the files in the -static subpackages commented out? Right now the -static subpackages are empty packages

They were in the original spec and I didn't notice. Uncommented.

New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-2.f...