Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673790
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2011-07-01
10:10:00 EDT ---
Hi Tom,
We've made this package block FE-LEGAL because we're not entirely sure if the
contents of this package (and the mingw-crt package, bug 673792) are okay to
add to Fedora. In earlier discussions on the fedora-mingw mailing list there
have been some signals about a legal audit which should be done:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2010-March/002557.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2010-May/002589.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/mingw/2011-January/003347.html
As we're uncertain if Red Hat/Fedora approves the use of these libraries and
headers we decided to have RH-Legal/Fedora legal take a look at it before
continuing with the introduction of mingw-w64 in Fedora.
Kai Tietz, one of the mingw-w64 developers has been hired by Red Hat recently
and he started to get the legal issues cleared in Red Hat internally. I don't
know what the progress of that is, but perhaps you could get in touch with each
other for further discussion?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.