Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312
--- Comment #6 from Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-18 12:40:43 EDT
---
If you say so— though this simply isn't the behavior it has on native binaries:
[gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ gcc test.c -o test -fstack-protector-all
[gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ ldd test
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffc618e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000038ef600000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000038ef200000)
Though yes indeed, it confuses the heck out of libtool which actually was my
problem in getting it to produce a static binary— intermediate libraries were
introducing the dynamic dependency when -static was only set at the final
linking stage.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.