Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Levente Farkas <lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org --- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas <lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org&gt; 2009-05-22 06:49:38 EDT --- native package glibc already contains it, but unfortunately msvcrt do not:-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones(a)redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; 2009-05-22 06:52:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) That's not a hard requirement. The requirement is only that what we package is a development tool or library. We do package other stuff that's not available natively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; 2009-05-22 07:11:22 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370223 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-rxspencer* mingw32-rxspencer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/librxspencer.a mingw32-rxspencer-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora BSD + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file (COPYRIGHT) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 20a95769c0adf98f0f014e0a423a0e32 rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4.tar.gz 20a95769c0adf98f0f014e0a423a0e32 x/rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl&gt; 2009-05-22 09:16:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; - alpha3.8.g4-3 - Use %%global instead of %%define As discussed on the mailing list, I don't know if this review needs to be continued: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001469.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; 2009-05-22 10:57:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) As far as I understand, Tor Lillqvist's gripes were: - same DLL filename for two completely incompatible libraries - use of "secret sauce" to compile the DLL You do neither. There's no secret sauce as far as I can see, and librxspencer-0.dll does not clash with any preexisting DLL afaik. So IMO we can continue. Anyway, I think it would be good to follow Kalev's comments, even though the project hasn't done a release the last 15 or so years and it's therefore quite unlikely it will anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; 2009-05-22 11:26:33 EDT --- Ok, so dropping out as reviewer and closing the review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.