Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-26 01:06:16 EDT --- Build fails: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOUR\ CE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -O2 -Wall -c sqlite3\ x_command.cpp -DPIC env: i686-pc-mingw32-g++: Permission denied make[1]: *** [sqlite3x_command.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18' make: *** [all] Error 2 Probable cause: missing BuildRequires: mingw32-gcc-c++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-28 09:23:08 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-6.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * License is MIT, which is Fedora approved * The license is the same as the corresponding native package ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? * There is no License file in the source tarfile (though some license statements are in the README file which is packaged). * The spec file is written in legible English * Source matches upstream f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 SRPM/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se&gt; 2009-04-29 05:27:38 EDT --- Do you still need BuildRequires: doxygen? Anyway, that you can check post-review. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-04-30 02:13:27 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-05-02 12:37:24 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2009-05-09 00:18:15 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.