https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096807
Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(erik-fedora@vanpi |
|enbroek.nl) |
--- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> ---
My deepest apologies for letting this review ticket remain open for such a long
time..
Here's the final review:
$ rpmlint mingw-SDL2_image.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc22.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc22.noarch.rpm
mingw64-SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc22.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-SDL_image
pkgconfig
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem >= 95
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libjpeg-62.dll)
mingw32(libpng16-16.dll)
mingw32(libtiff-5.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32-pkg-config
mingw32(sdl.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --requires mingw64-SDL_image
pkgconfig
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw64-crt
mingw64-filesystem >= 95
mingw64(kernel32.dll)
mingw64(libjpeg-62.dll)
mingw64(libpng16-16.dll)
mingw64(libtiff-5.dll)
mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
mingw64-pkg-config
mingw64(sdl.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
$ rpm --query --provides mingw32-SDL_image
mingw32-SDL_image = 1.2.12-11.fc21
mingw32(sdl_image.dll)
$ rpm --query --provides mingw64-SDL_image
mingw64-SDL_image = 1.2.12-11.fc21
mingw64(sdl_image.dll)
$ wget --quiet
http://www.libSDL.org/projects/SDL_image/release/SDL2_image-2.0.0.tar.gz -O - |
md5sum
fb399c8386fb3248f1b33cfe81bdf92b -
$ md5sum SDL2_image-2.0.0.tar.gz
fb399c8386fb3248f1b33cfe81bdf92b SDL2_image-2.0.0.tar.gz
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[!] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4
to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
The BuildRequires for mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc is optional
and can be removed, but this is a cosmetic thing.
======================================================
The package mingw-SDL2_image is APPROVED by epienbro
======================================================
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1I0E7I3Lu6&a=cc_unsubscribe