On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 16:43 -0400, Dan Easley wrote:
On 7/27/06, Florin Andrei <florin(a)andrei.myip.org> wrote:
> Now, here's my thoughts: this is a set of LADSPA plugins. It works
> strictly in conjunction with the package named "ladspa" - indeed, it is
> an extension to it.
> Therefore, I believe that the name of the plugins package should include
> the string "ladspa" somewhere. Examples:
>
> ladspa-swh-plugins
>
> Or perhaps even more logical:
>
> ladspa-plugins-swh
for what it's worth, i agree completely.
So, is there a consensus? What is it?
I would go for: ladspa-plugins-NAME
What if the name of the package already contains "plugins"?
-- Fernando