I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate
bug reports
with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So
ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard
configuration we need detailed reports to have that information be
useful for those people that actually have to deal with the
information and fix the problem.
I've already stopped writing bug reports against Fedora - I've concluded
their requirement that the submitter describe "how to reproduce the bug"
is to me not worth my time and effort. Fedora is *their* product - what
does it matter to me whether it retains bugs ?
You would like "all the information needed". I thought I posted to the
effect that when an XO-1 with 12.1.0 build os6 is booted, nothing gets
defined in the /dev tree against which a 'mount' command could be issued
in order to access the content of a partition on the SD card plugged
into the XO-1 external slot (beneath the screen). It is not clear to me
what the "we need detailed reports" are that would allow you to discover
whether such a problem exists on the XO-1 you use.
Note that for my purposes I was able to bypass this problem. What I was
not able to ignore was the os6 (on XO-1) reaction to having an entry in
/etc/fstab referencing this undefined (on os6) storage device. But I
agree that having such an entry in /etc/fstab is "non-standard" -- from
now on, I will make sure to NEVER for 12.1.0 to mention any problems I
have with whatever I do that is "non-standard".
mikus