Re: Moving OLPC merge to mainline forwards
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 23:51 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Alot of the OLPC only packages don't have anything in
devel anyway,
>
> That definitely sounds like something that we should be able to fix
> pretty easily.
Cool, I'll start working through them. For the packages that currently
have forks what will happen when its rebased. I presume the ones like
NetworkManger will currently need to keep the forks so do we need to
flag the mainlined ones for when they're merged?
For things like NetworkManager (and evince being the other that
immediately springs to mind) where there's an older version in the
OLPC-3 branch, flagging them to make sure they're kept track of is
worthwhile. In most cases, they're "something needs to be ported" --
eg, some of the Sugar bits for the new NetworkManager dbus api or
similar.
Keeping that in a bug blocking the FedoraOLPCDelta bug seems like
probably the lowest-effort way of doing so
Jeremy