Hi Sebastian,
I'm concerned that you guys are planning to require activity authors
to package their activities in Fedora, in order to see them shipped in
SoaS. Is this the case?
Currently SoaS pulls a predefined list of activities from ASLO.
I think requiring Fedora packaging would be too much extra work
activity authors. If you look at the packaged versions on
download.sugarlabs.org, many are out of date from their ASLO
equivalents.
Also, will you still allow packages from rpmfusion? These are
currently required to make VirtualBox Guest Additions work.
Best,
Wade
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian(a)when.com> wrote:
This is it. First meeting after some time, quite some folks joined.
Thanks to all those who dropped by! Here are the minutes and logs:
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.minutes.20091231_1013...
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.log.20091231_1013.html
Next date is the Sugar Packaging Session on Jan 6, 1500 UTC [1] - if
you're interested in learning how to package, join us!
--Sebastian
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom#Upcoming_Classes
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel(a)lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel