On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Radek Novacek <rnovacek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon 05 of Aug 2013 9:10:41 Roman Rakus wrote:
> Any consensus?
>
> I'm going to write scripts, licensed under LGPLv2+ or BSD (2-clause
> license as described on wikipedia [1])
>
> RR
>
> [1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
I don't see any advantage in using dual licensing, it's just mess. Everyone
making changes will take the BSD license because it's giving him more freedom
- he can use it even with *GPL* code.
I would suggest using BSD-style license only in order to simplify adoption of
the scripts.
I agree. Let's just go with BSD 2-clause.