On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 11:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/21/2013 10:59 AM, Russell Doty wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:30 +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
>> On 08/21/2013 03:32 PM, Russell Doty wrote:
>>> Do we want to install anything from sblim? (I don't think so,
>>> but want to raise the question.)
>> Now we depend (all providers?) on sblim-cmpi-base.
> Sounds like we should include it!
Well, dependencies are handled automatically. We don't need to specify
them directly. I left out 'openlmi-providers' from my list above for
the same reason. It's automatically pulled in by the others.
Hmmm, good point.
For the purposes of planning and discussion, can we have our list of
packages include the ones brought in as dependencies - at least the LMI
specific packages. If, for example, openlmi-tools brings in
sblim-cmpi-base, can we show it as:
*openlmi-server
- openlmi-tools
- sblim-cmpi-base