Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> writes:
Ok, while your point is valid, there's an (unfortunate)
perception by
many that what I said is true. [...]
Please help correct the perception then! :-)
I stand by my recommendation that we should use a more permissive
license here. I'm certainly open to arguments to the contrary,
though.
Considering the tiny (?) scripts, any elaborate licensing is probably
unjustified. Public domain, dual licensing, BSD, whatever...
- FChE