On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:08 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/21/2013 08:56 AM, Roman Rakus wrote:
> This seems to be correct. What I can imagine is also a group of
> packages. What other thinks about it? Having all stuff (CIMOM,
> providers, lmishell, ...) in one group will inform people what
> other thing are available.
>
I was thinking about having us provide a set of meta-packages like
'openlmi-server' and 'openlmi-enterprise' that would bind up the set
of providers, CIMOMs and dependencies that we want people to be
installing most of the time.
openlmi-server (normal set of providers for all servers):
tog-pegasus
openlmi-storage
openlmi-networking
openlmi-software
openlmi-account
openlmi-realmd
I would make realmd optional, or at least put it in the enterprise
package.
openlmi-service
The hardware (inventory) Provider should be in
the base package.
What about the lmi-tools package?
Do we want to install anything from sblim? (I don't think so, but want
to raise the question.)
openlmi-enterprise (comprehensive providers and discovery):
openlmi-server
openslp
openlmi-fan
openlmi-hardware
openlmi-logicalfile
openlmi-powermanagement
Looking ahead, which package (if any) should new Providers be included
in?
* firewall
* SELinux
* SCAP
* Monitoring (general, Performance Copilot)
* logging
* other?
_______________________________________________
openlmi-devel mailing list
openlmi-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel