package-review April 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
906 discussions

[Bug 171314] Review Request: gtkhtml36
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkhtml36 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171314 paul(a)city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-04-27 07:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for the excellent review. > I made all of the suggested and mandatory changes: > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36-3.6.2-3.fc5.src.rpm > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/gtkhtml36.spec Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

1 0

[Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From foolish(a)guezz.net 2006-04-27 05:44 EST ------- The reason I'm doing this package in the first place was to fill a dependency for the blam news reader (#187621) which doesn't build with the gecko-sharp2 package. I'm sure blam can be patched to use gecko-sharp2, but that's work that should happen upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

1 0

[Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy(a)smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy(a)smile.org.ua 2006-04-27 05:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) I've fixed after comment this issue. Please, review last update at: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 04:40 EST ------- It's the same package, just has a different name. I'll close this request and reopen if I find differently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-04-27 03:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Hey guys, I'm still here. Unfortunately I had a hardware failure which left me > disconnected from the rest of the world for a bit and also held my ssh key > hostage. I just got a new laptop and rescued my data from the dead machine, and > I'm just about ready to push up the update to this package. Please close this > bug and let me know that it's ok for me to procede. > > Please feel free to contact me via regular email, I'll try to be as responsive > as possible. Jeff, are you going to fix the issue raised in Comment #5 with the update? You'll need to remove the package from the OrphanedPackages page on the wiki too if you haven't already done so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-04-27 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Is it serious, real, critical showstopper? It wil enhance review period for > another couple of weeks because of "upstream" being on vacation. No, it's not a blocker. It's a "SHOULD" in the package review guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 177619] Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177619 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez(a)ivazquez.net 2006-04-27 03:32 EST ------- Updated. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-nltk-lite-0.6.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
...
91
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review April 2006