package-review April 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
906 discussions

[Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-27 12:29 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-1.2.5-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-1.2.5-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff(a)ocjtech.us> - 1.2.5-2 - Changed ownership of device nodes to "root" in udev rules file. - Don't build sethdlc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From toshio(a)tiki-lounge.com 2006-04-27 12:11 EST ------- Hmmm Paul - do you want to take over packaging and I'll review? I'm only swamped with work, not seriously swamped :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de 2006-04-27 11:38 EST ------- You may be able to download the current CPL text from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt and add is to your package. Then you may poke the upstream to include a verbatin copy of the license in the upstream package. When this may be happen, you can create an updated version of your package, which use the text from the upstream package instead of the text from www.gnu.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 180300] Review Request: ccrtp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccrtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180300 Christian.Iseli(a)licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|openvpn |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 11:31 EST ------- Also, the current version seems to be 2.1; there are what look to be serious security implications for any version older than 2.1. (Sorry for spamming, but I was starting on a review when I noticed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-04-27 10:23 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-3.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/zaptel-kmod-1.2.5-1.2.5-3.2.6.16_1.2157_FC6.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Apr 27 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff(a)ocjtech.us> - 1.2.5-3 - Update zaptel-ztdummy-250hz.diff.txt with fixes from Andy Kwong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ultimateevil.org 2006-04-27 10:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Up to you. I'd push upstream to look at this sooner rather than later though. Ok, I'm gonna get the build out there as soon as I can, and I'll notify the developer list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-04-27 09:37 EST ------- > I'm sure blam can be patched to use gecko-sharp2, but that's work that > should happen upstream. Well, it's work that should coordinate with upstream. If it's a simple fix, there's no reason not to make it and carry the patch until upstream incorporates it if it lets us avoid adding what is essentially a dead package into extras. That said, there's certainly precedent for keeping in extras old packages that have been superceded by incompatible versions in core. (See gtk+.) But it's worth at least asking upstream to see what their plans are and what they recommend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187186] Review Request: up-imapproxy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-04-27 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Ok, removed from OrphanedPackages. > > I do see this error when building on FC5. I know upstream is preparing a new > release, hopefully this will be corrected. I don't know how to fix this error > myself. Is it still ok to schedule a build? Up to you. I'd push upstream to look at this sooner rather than later though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner(a)gmx.net 2006-04-27 07:57 EST ------- So I have build an new spec file. I think I have do all needed changes. I have alos fix the readers config file. And the spec file can now be used for FC4 and FC5. here the URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
91
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review April 2006