January 2019 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1659282] Review Request: python-string_utils - A python module containing utility functions for strings

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659282 Jason Montleon <jmontleo(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2019-01-29 13:56:11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1654833] Review Request: python-kubernetes - add python-kuberenetes to EPEL 7

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654833 Bug 1654833 depends on bug 1654835, which changed state. Bug 1654835 Summary: Review Request: python-google-auth - Add python-google-auth to EPEL 7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654835 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1654835] Review Request: python-google-auth - Add python-google-auth to EPEL 7

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654835 Jason Montleon <jmontleo(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2019-01-29 13:55:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1658199] Review Request: netatalk - Open Source Apple Filing Protocol(AFP) File Server

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com> --- Scott - Thank you very much to taking on this review. I was beginning to wonder what creative posts I might need to come up with on the devel list, funny jokes, recent declaration of independence, etc to persuade someone to review this for me. I owe you one, should you ever need me to review one of your requests. > %global _hardened_build 1 > This shouldn't be needed in Fedora anymore Agreed. I have this included because I plan to build for el7, and hardened builds default to off. > Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/netatalk/netatalk-%{version}.tar.bz2 > Use https. Will do. > BuildRequires: rpm > I don't think you need to BuildRequire rpm. Take a look at the pkgver and xslver macros. They call the rpm binary. While I'd call these macros unusual in the way they are created, these predate my involvement so I left them alone. If there is a prettier way to go about creating these macros, I'm certainly willing to look into it. > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version} > I think you need to include the epoch here. You are absolutely right. I forgot the modify this line when I put epoch back in. I am out of town for my dayjob all week this week. I will add these action items to my to-do list when I return home. Thanks again for taking on this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1659286] Review Request: python-openshift - Python client for the OpenShift API

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659286 Bug 1659286 depends on bug 1659281, which changed state. Bug 1659281 Summary: Review Request: python-dictdiffer - Dictdiffer is a module that helps you to diff and patch dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659281 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1659281] Review Request: python-dictdiffer - Dictdiffer is a module that helps you to diff and patch dictionaries

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659281 Jason Montleon <jmontleo(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2019-01-29 13:50:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1636111] Review Request: glyr - Glyr is a music related metadata searchengine

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636111 --- Comment #34 from Matias De lellis <mati86dl(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Mukundan, I was on vacation, now I take it back... ppc64le: - /builddir/build/BUILD/glyr/spec/capi/check_dbc.c:110:E:DBCache:test_iter_db:0: (after this point) Test timeout expired aarch64: - /builddir/build/BUILD/glyr/spec/capi/check_dbc.c:110:E:DBCache:test_iter_db:0: (after this point) Test timeout expired armv7hl: - /builddir/build/BUILD/glyr/spec/capi/check_dbc.c:110:E:DBCache:test_iter_db:0: (after this point) Test timeout expired The three compilations failed on test due to the same problem. :disapointed: It seems just a temp problem, because in the correct compilations, this test was executed and passed .. Can you try again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1315759] Review Request: restraint - Simple test harness which can be used with beaker

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315759 Artem Savkov <asavkov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2019-01-29 09:21:16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1481630] Review Request: virtualbox-guest-additions - VirtualBox Guest Additions

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630 --- Comment #90 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #89) > Hi , thanks for the reply , another question, can we use new vboxsf source > [1] in el7 ? > > i.e. instead use new vboxsf source [1] code only in F28+ [2], can I use it > for all cases (el7 and old F27 for example ) ? No, the new vboxsf sources rely on the upstreamed vboxguest driver which is not in the RHEL7 / F27 kernels. > BTW in vboxsf-master/super.c line 153 if (flags & MS_REMOUNT) FTBFS with > kernel 5.0.0-rc3 , I'm testing add this [3] to source code , based on [4] I've fixed this myself by simply dropping the 2 lines, the VFS core already does this check, so it is not necessary. I've just pushed this change to: https://github.com/jwrdegoede/vboxsf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1658199] Review Request: netatalk - Open Source Apple Filing Protocol(AFP) File Server

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199 --- Comment #17 from Scott Talbert <swt(a)techie.net> --- > %package devel > Summary: Development files for %{name} > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version} I think you need to include the epoch here. I think this is causing this rpmlint warning: netatalk-devel.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-dependency-on netatalk/netatalk-libs/libnetatalk 3.1.12 5:3.1.12 Also, the package is building fine but fails to install. I haven't looked into why exactly, but do you see that problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review January 2019