https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017119
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
The spec file looks really good now.
However, we still need to fix a couple of things that fedora-review
tool discovered.
The checksum for the .tar.gz that you baked into your .src.rpm has a
different checksum than this file
https://github.com/minfrin/retry/archive/retry-1.0.4/retry-1.0.4.tar.gz
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
98abe614ef43fb31c99c7e941cddf3df0527361dc81be395066831eb6e1e7515
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
e7ab48923fd91aa2c5397cb2db4907a486176a582efe892a2113c9b91655f1e8
In fact, they are totally different tarballs. If you extract the SRPM
file using this command `rpm2cpio ./retry-1.0.4-1.fc36.src.rpm | cpio -i`
and explore the tarball, you can see that there are different files
than in the upstream tarball.
Rpmlint also discovered this
retry.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 ['1.0.4-1.fc36',
'1.0.4-1']
Basically, your 1.0.4 version is not mentioned in the changelog.
Also, when you make updates to a specfile, don't forget to bump the
release number and add a new changelog entry :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017119