https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #11)
I'm happy to continue the review if another reviewer comes along,
I don't understand this sentence. Raphael said that he can review the package
in comment #8. If he cannot do it, I'm sure that somebody else (e.g. me) would
step up.
but I do
think a re-review will be in order (even if unofficially) if the build
system and change.
Nah, the build system is not visible in the binary package. As
long as it
builds nobody cares (except the maintainer of course).
Is the plan to get all the neuroscience packages into Fedora by F24,
though
- or can we have a "group copr" thing running and transition packages over
as they pass review?
I don't think there's a plan to get "all" neuroscience packages into
Fedora,
there's probably too many to even consider that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NeuroFedora doesn't have a specific
list. New packages can be added at any time, and there's quite a bit of time
before Fedora 24 release (2016-05-17). I don't know about any plans to have a
group copr. I see coprs as a good mechanism to provide alternative versions of
already packaged software, or often updated software, or things which are
inappropriate for main Fedora for other reasons. I don't think nest or other
science related software falls into any of those categories, and making a
"detour" through copr would be mostly a waste of time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component