https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love <dave.love(a)manchester.ac.uk> ---
As far as doc files are concerned, I think you should consider the version
you're packaging, rather than a future one, and the source built for me, so
there doesn't seem to be a reason not to include it. (If you mean you won't
ship the doc source eventually, that would make it non-free by Debian
standards.)
I'm not sure what the problem is with shipping small example files as part of
the documentation, which is what's normally done, though I don't think
there's
policy on it. If tests run without docker, can you run them in %check? (I
don't know if the builders have the namespace support turned on, and should
probably check; if not, perhaps it could be turned on if it helps this sort of
package.)
Creating the READMEs should happen under %install, not %check. I'll check more
closely later.
You can't get the package into Fedora without being a maintainer, and you
probably need to do some informal reviews before someone will sponsor you, so
yes, you should be working on that. See the relevant links under
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
(It would probably have been better for me to submit packaging and make you
co-maintainer initially, but we'll have to work from here.)
Hope that helps for the moment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component