https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140723
Arthur Bols <arthur(a)bols.dev> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review+
Status|NEW |POST
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
CC| |arthur(a)bols.dev
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |arthur(a)bols.dev
--- Comment #3 from Arthur Bols <arthur(a)bols.dev> ---
Package Review
==============
Package was generated by go2rpm, which simplifies the review.
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
- Missing -f flag on %gometa
New packages should use this to exclude %ix86
Checks:
=======
[x]: Spec file is sane.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: License is correct and license file is included.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Package builds in mock.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: rpmlint shows no relevant errors.
There are many warnings about duplicate files, but these seem to be needed
for testing, so can be ignored.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
Package APPROVED. Please fix the issue above before import.
Post import tasks:
- Add @go-sig with commit or admin access to the package
- If possible, add your package to
release-monitoring.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140723
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...