https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #5 from Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling(a)googlemail.com> ---
Ok I did those changes now:
- Tried to make the summary of the main package better
- Splitted the ui part in order to prevent depedency on ui libs for the core
packages
- Fixed ownership of the plugins (they are now actually owned by their
subpackages)
- Fixed ownership of some directories
- Moved %%doc to the main package
- Made the requirement of the base package arch-specific
- Fixed html doc installation
- Made the doc package noarch
I splitted the ui executable into a seperate package to prevent having QtGui in
the main one.
So now only the cpp subpackage does not require any additional packages.
However i wonder whether this really makes sense... In the future there will
come more modules for different languages. I think it would be more consistent
to have all of those modules as subpackage instead of having some included and
some not. But well I am open for suggestions here.
I also asked about the lgpl exception on the maillinglist (CC'd you).
I hope I caught all unowned directories (is there some kind of tool to help
checking for this?).
Otherwise I think I fixed all the issues you mentioned.
Regards and thanks a lot for your comments,
Erik
Updated SPEC file:
http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs.spec
New SRPM file:
http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs-1.0.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Sd9naPAQMm&a=cc_unsubscribe