Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library)
Alias: bitgtkmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 20:07 EST
-------
8-->
It's there. It's in the standard devel line, right above the specific requires
that I add for bitgtkmm:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
<--8
D'oh!
8-->
Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a
lot of the
output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm
installed (or a few of the others)
Those are all added by rpmbuild.
<--8
No. These are packages required to run. Say I didn't have atkmm on my machine
(just as an example). Without the R atkmm being explictly states in the spec
file, the package would know no better until it gets to a point that atkmm is
needed and then it falls over dead.
I had a similar problem with Anjuta-1.2.4a a while back in that gtkmm was not in
as an explicit R. However, when you came to try and create a gtkmm package, the
software complained like crazy. Add the R line for gtkmm and everything was
happy again.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.