https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010172
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
The fedora-review tool is reporting one issue
Issues:
=======
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr-
rpmbuild/results/hwk/diff.txt
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
The diff.txt looks like this
diff -U2 -r
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal
--- /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal
2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200
+++
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal
2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@
maintainer: Jens Petersen <juhpetersen(a)gmail.com>
copyright: 2016-2017 Lukas Martinelli,
- 2020-2021 Jens Petersen
+ 2020 Jens Petersen
category: Development
build-type: Simple
diff -U2 -r
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/README.md
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/README.md
--- /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/README.md
2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200
+++
/home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/README.md
2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
# hwk ![MIT licensed](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg)
+<img align="right" alt="hwk" src="hwk.png" />
+
**hwk** (pronounced "hawk") is a simple Haskell-based commandline text
processing tool, somewhat similar to tools like *awk*, *grep*, *sed*.
`hwk` applies composed pure Haskell functions to a list of lines of input,
enabling text processing without having to remember an obscure DSL or awkward
cli options. This tool can also help to encourage people to think functionally.
-<img align="right" alt="[hawk image]" src="hwk.png"
/>
-
hwk was originally written by Lukas Martinelli in 2016-2017:
see the [original README file](README.md.orig).
There is a difference only in metadata so it shouldn't cause any
problems but I am more worried about why there is this sources
mismatch in the first place.
Do you understand how it happened?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010172