https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794832
--- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti <yaneti(a)declera.com> ---
(In reply to Benjamin Gilbert from comment #3)
1. Why are we installing random binaries into %{_libdir}/fcct instead
of
%{_libexecdir}/fcct?
They're not executable programs from Linux's perspective, so libexecdir
didn't seem appropriate. libdir seemed a better fit for
architecture-specific data. I've now removed the executable bits as well.
Then perhaps you should treat them as firmware, i.e under $datadir and in a
noarch subpackage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component