https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #4)
Issues, in no particular order
- There is one bundled source file:
src/main/java/org/springframework/data/redis/connection/util/Base64.java
Removed.
Use jvm Base64
It carries a BSD license. It probably isn't packaged anywhere,
since it is
a single class file, so I'm not concerned about the bundling. I don't know
what that does to the license field, though. If ASL 2.0 subsumes BSD, then
the current license tag is fine. Otherwise, it needs to be "ASL 2.0 and
BSD", with a comment explaining the license breakdown.
Only for information
net.iharder:base64 is under Public Domain license
- The final requires include "mvn(junit:junit)". Is that
correct, or is that
an unintended side effect of adding test deps in %prep?
Fixed
- Under the Java section is a question about whether the upstream
build
method
is used. That doesn't appear to be the case here. The build is being done
with maven, but it looks like gradle is the upstream build tool of choice.
I'm ignorant about such matters, though. Does this matter?
No, is
irrilevant
Spec URL:
https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-data-redis.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-data-redis-1.3.5-2.fc22.src.rpm
Task info:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10874153
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component