https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653010
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Carmen Bianca Bakker from comment #3)
Hi Robert-André,
Thanks for your quick and detailed review. I have updated the spec and srpm
at the links to include your suggestions except:
LGTM, package approved.
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - CC-BY-SA-4.0 The shorthand should be CC-BY-SA
<
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main> says that CC-BY-SA is
shorthand for CC-BY-SA-3.0. I'd like it doubly confirmed if CC-BY-SA can be
shorthand for _both_, though that would be rather not-very-ideal.
From Tom answer to your mail:
The 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses are as good as the 3.0
versions. I have updated the links to the CC licenses to point to the
4.0 revision, no change in License tag in package spec files is required.
~tom
You still need to find a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component