https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653010
--- Comment #5 from Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
LGTM, package approved.
Thanks!
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> > - CC-BY-SA-4.0 The shorthand should be CC-BY-SA
>
> <
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main> says that CC-BY-SA is
> shorthand for CC-BY-SA-3.0. I'd like it doubly confirmed if CC-BY-SA can be
> shorthand for _both_, though that would be rather not-very-ideal.
From Tom answer to your mail:
The 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses are as good as the 3.0
versions. I have updated the links to the CC licenses to point to the
4.0 revision, no change in License tag in package spec files is required.
Should I update the licence to point to `CC-BY-SA` instead of `CC-BY-SA-4.0`
now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component