https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #37 from jiri vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com> ---
jdk11 havebeen forked.
It's been suggested that
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk is the
Shenandoah dev forest and we should not be using it. We should be using
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk11 once jdk/jdk11 has been forked.
Either way, we'll be changing sources in an update:
jdk/jdk => jdk/jdk11
or
jdk/jdk => shenandoah/jdk11
Shenadoah was not. I guess it will anytime soon.
Once forked, is it ok enough tobe used?
We should just use jdk/jdk now for all arches and move to shenandoah/jdk11
once it exists.
There shouldn't be any shenandoah specific things in the spec file as far as
I understand it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component