https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #21 from Jan Pokorný <jpokorny(a)redhat.com> ---
Regarding licenses, we have the situation with multiple licenses
involved. What do the guidelines[1] have to say:
The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the
binary rpm.
[...]
If a source package generates multiple binary packages, the License:
field may differ between them if necessary. This implies that a
single spec may have multiple per-subpackage License: tags.
README.license file makes the distinction clear: applications
(executables) vs. libraries.
Brief look suggest this pairing of subpackages:
* libraries:
- lib*.rpm
* application/executable:
- kronosnetd*.rpm
Respective subpackages should receive the license tag individually
per the above dichotomy ("LGPLv2+" and "GPLv2+", respectively).
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component